Repohistory vs Nitrozen
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | Repohistory | 
Nitrozen |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | GitHub repository analytics tool that tracks traffic history beyond GitHub's 14-day limit | Product changelog platform for SaaS teams |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | IN |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: $0 per month (1 repository, traffic history beyond 14 days, advanced analytics & insights, data export); Pro: $7.5 per month billed yearly (unlimited repositories, all Free features, user/org traffic overview, priority support) | Free: $0/month with 1 project, 5 entries per month, public changelog page, Markdown support, category badges, and embeddable widget. Pro: $9.99/month with 1 project, 100 entries per month, custom domains, priority support, analytics for 30 days, and API access. Business: $29.99/month with 10 project |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 37 no change since last check | 25 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 18 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 59 | 5 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Repohistory More alternatives to Nitrozen